Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Carole Monnet vs Fiona Ferro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Monnet vs Ferro analysis and find out who is favored!
Carole Monnet vs Fiona Ferro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Monnet has won 40.63% of points on his second serve, while Ferro has won 48.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Monnet, in recent form, has won 54.62% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ferro has won 57.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.48% and 38.69% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Monnet has saved 53.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferro has saved 52.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Monnet has won 50.68% of matches played (W/L 37/ 36), with Ferro winning 56.45% (W/L 35/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Monnet has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 100/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 11/ 22). Ferro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 201/ 130), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Monnet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.23% of matches (W/L 33/ 29), where as Ferro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.7% of matches (W/L 27/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Monnet has played against opponents with an average rank of 290.41 while Ferro has played against players with an average rank of 249.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Monnet has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferro has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Monnet has converted 45.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferro has converted 45.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Monnet 0 - 0 Ferro
184
Rank
162
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
149
Rank
39
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
57% (225-171)
Career Total W/L
56% (307-245)
49% (17-18)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$158,815
Career Prize Money
$1,390,722
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Carole Monnet | Fiona Ferro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 49% (17/18) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (37/40) | 58% (33/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (337/358) | 52% (274/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 75% (6/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) | 40% (4/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.64 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 216 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:52 | 1:44:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.31 | 281.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1460/2341) | 66% (1159/1764) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (874/1460) | 60% (697/1159) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (358/881) | 49% (296/605) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (136/301) | 46% (98/215) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1059/2298) | 45% (785/1728) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (15/15) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (15/32) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 18% (2/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 73% (15/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 27% (15/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 16% (19/3) | 13% (8/1) |
Carole Monnet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Claire Liu
Player
Carole Monnet
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Carole Monnet
83%
(
58 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Selena Janicijevic
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Carole Monnet
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
82%
(
64 of
78)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Tereza Martincova
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Carole Monnet
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenny Duerst
Player
Carole Monnet
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Carole Monnet
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Carole Monnet
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fiona Ferro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Cristina Bucsa
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Fiona Ferro
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Lauren Davis
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Fiona Ferro
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
67 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Manon Leonard
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Fiona Ferro
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
74 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Monnet Vs Ferro Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Fiona Ferro
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
